BHM's Homesteading & Self-Reliance Forum

Posting requires Registration and the use of Cookies-enabled browser


Go Back   BHM Forum > Self-Reliance & Preparedness > Financial

Financial Anything money-related that does not have a dedicated board.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2015, 07:38 PM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default Social Security Cutbacks

See where your benefits fit in with the projections:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retir...rry/ar-AAblTFV
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2015, 08:17 PM
coaltrain's Avatar
coaltrain Male coaltrain is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NW Penna
Posts: 1,722
Default

I like the part where it says you can protect yourself by investing to make up the gap.

Invest what exactly.....??

Quote:
If there's a bright spot to this problem, it's this: You still have time to prepare yourself to cover for that gap. Regardless of when it gets published, the odds are that the 2015 Social Security Trustees Report will project that the Trust Funds will empty in about 18 years, plus or minus two or so. That's enough time to invest to make up the gap, but the buffer isn't what it used to be. The longer you wait -- or the closer future Trustees Reports move that date forward -- the tougher it will be for you to cover it.
__________________
~Stan~
It is what it is
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2015, 12:36 AM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default

Some kind of stocks/bonds?

But who's making any money through investments?

Gee, if I waited until 70 to collect, they'd be almost bankrupt. Glad I put in for it now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-22-2015, 09:49 AM
coaltrain's Avatar
coaltrain Male coaltrain is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NW Penna
Posts: 1,722
Default

If one had enough stocks and bonds to invest you wouldn't need Social Security.

The article is assuming that everyone has a hefty retirement portfolio I guess...what about the people who have nothing but their social security income - that has to be somewhat of a percentage of the recipients.
__________________
~Stan~
It is what it is
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2015, 11:09 AM
Setanta Male Setanta is offline
Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 678
Default

They make it sound like they encourage people to start putting money into private 401ks and IRAs and other stuff in the private sector. however that won't stop people from being mandated to invest/contribute to social security. so by their logic everyone should keep paying social security tax, then money into a private account. most people live paycheck by paycheck and carry too much debt to save $10 a week let alone invest.

I was ahead of the curb to an extent myself, when i got out of college and got a full time job with 401k i opted to choose how the money was invested rather than automatically trust the standard investments under the employee package, i also chose to put in 10% of every paycheck into the 401k (employer contributions+my own made it increase in size very fast). when the economy tanked everyone of my co workers left their accounts to the fudiciary to continue to manage, and kept hoping things would turn around while they watched their retirement nest eggs reduced in size by 10s of thousands. i was the only one at the office not loosing money, but my gains were only just on par with the official inflation rate. I only had the 401k for 4 years, i ended up loosing my position as a result of my employer being broke.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-22-2015, 09:54 PM
MissouriFree's Avatar
MissouriFree MissouriFree is online now
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central missouri woods
Posts: 17,118
Default

Meaningless. Article. It is based on current law . do you really believe lawmakers will not do something in the next 20 years .
__________________
work like you don't need the money- love like you never been hurt and dance like no one is watching !!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2015, 11:11 AM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default

??????????
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-23-2015, 12:09 PM
MissouriFree's Avatar
MissouriFree MissouriFree is online now
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central missouri woods
Posts: 17,118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by connie189 View Post
??????????
The article forecasts a social security go broke date that is based on current law. Do you thing our law makers will let that happen ? Of course not they will adjust either contributions or benefits or both to avoid go broke and thus protect thier reelections.
That's why it is meaningless.
__________________
work like you don't need the money- love like you never been hurt and dance like no one is watching !!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-23-2015, 01:06 PM
Setanta Male Setanta is offline
Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissouriFree View Post
The article forecasts a social security go broke date that is based on current law. Do you thing our law makers will let that happen ? Of course not they will adjust either contributions or benefits or both to avoid go broke and thus protect thier reelections.
That's why it is meaningless.

well said, seniors often amount to the largest portion of votors and have significant influence.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-23-2015, 03:58 PM
rubyyarn's Avatar
rubyyarn Female rubyyarn is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 1,113
Default

The suggestion that folks on Social Security invest in the stock market is just crazy! It just sounds like an even better way of losing your shirt :/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-23-2015, 05:13 PM
anna anna is offline
Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 744
Default

Quickest was to get SS fixed is to require everyone in the government to give up all their golden retirement plans (including President (and past Presidents) and Congress (current & past) and ALL government employees (past & present)) and become part of the SS program. They'd find a way to fix it PDQ.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-23-2015, 06:00 PM
MissouriFree's Avatar
MissouriFree MissouriFree is online now
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: central missouri woods
Posts: 17,118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anna View Post
Quickest was to get SS fixed is to require everyone in the government to give up all their golden retirement plans (including President (and past Presidents) and Congress (current & past) and ALL government employees (past & present)) and become part of the SS program. They'd find a way to fix it PDQ.
All govt workers are part of social security system now days. They pay in Same percentages as anyone else. Not sure what you expect retired govt workers to do ! They don't collect SS unless they paid in the required number of quarters in non govt job---just like every other American !!!! In fact even if they do they get reduced despite earning it. Really get screwed.
__________________
work like you don't need the money- love like you never been hurt and dance like no one is watching !!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-23-2015, 08:00 PM
doc doc is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: central WI--finally!
Posts: 1,473
Default

[QUOTE=coaltrain;411627

Invest what exactly.....??[/QUOTE]

Reminds me of the old Yogi Berra anecdote: Hey Yogi! What would you do if you found a bag on the sidewalk with a million dollars in it? Yogi: If someone poor lost it, I'd give it back.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-24-2015, 12:49 AM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default

Let's see, there were a few no increases, then had to "argue" about it one year. (Guess who was blocking increases?) Of course, not election years...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-24-2015, 01:24 AM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default

Interesting...

There's a Backwoods article dated 2/23/01 on the same topic:

"Our Bankrupt Social Security System" by Dave Duffy.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-24-2015, 11:55 AM
rubyyarn's Avatar
rubyyarn Female rubyyarn is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 1,113
Default

Our politicians have been aware of the Social Security problem since at least 1990 when I became interested in politics. They knew the Baby Boomers were coming and that the system could possibly be overwhelmed. But no one wanted to touch it. The Democrats wanted the votes. The Republicans made a few gestures but allowed themselves to be shouted down.

Well, folks, the day of reckoning is here. The Baby Boomers have arrived and expect their benefits. And...guess what? Death Panels are beginning to sound pretty good to the political class.

It will be interesting to see what happens. Cut benefits and many retirees will re-join the work force. The youngsters are already complaining about the seniors who refuse to retire, what will they think when a good chunk of us return to the work force? We know how to work, we are reliable, and we don't freak when the electronics crash.

Interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-24-2015, 01:26 PM
SKB Female SKB is offline
Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 785
Default

What angers me is that some people work and get paid well but by receiving cash, do not pay taxes of any kind. There's a creepy 40-ish man who attaches himself to any old timer he can. He had a job at Wal-Mart but quit because he says they wanted him to work too much. He hung around next door, "caring" for my elderly male neighbor who referred to him as a nuisance and a mooch. The old man died, and the new neighbor is blind. Rather than get help from a home health care agency, she allows this guy to move in and care for her. He cooks, cleans and now drives a new truck. He tried to attach himself to me but I made it clear he needed to back off and leave me alone. If/when I need help I will get it from an agency, not some guy who is not held to any standards, with no training or insurance.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-25-2015, 12:41 AM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default

This is a strange question, but have you noticed there are less really older people out there (on the streets everyday).

I even quizzed hubby about it; he said he noticed it, too.

When I say "older" like 80-
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-25-2015, 12:54 AM
SKB Female SKB is offline
Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 785
Default

Now that you mention it, yes. It could be that they have no need, meals and meds are delivered and home health aides can do errands.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-25-2015, 01:11 AM
connie189 Female connie189 is offline
Grand Master Pontificator
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,223
Default

My MIL here is held up in a retirement home...hardly ever ventures out.

Which is kinda bad...(exercise).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -2. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996 to Present. Backwoods Home Magazine, Inc.