{"id":2585,"date":"2014-01-20T12:00:46","date_gmt":"2014-01-20T16:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/?p=2585"},"modified":"2014-01-20T12:00:46","modified_gmt":"2014-01-20T16:00:46","slug":"memes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/memes\/","title":{"rendered":"MEMES"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Looking through the relatively thin pickings of meaningful new gun designs in this year\u2019s crop, I noticed that one I mentioned here, the Glock 42, a seven-shot .380 pistol, got a ton of comment on the internet. Much of that commentary was on the theme of \u201cif I\u2019m going to carry a gun that size, I\u2019d want it in full power 9mm Parabellum, not a wussy .380 a\/k\/a 9mm Short.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Let me make it clear: I\u2019m not a .380 fan. In 40-plus years of studying gunfights \u2013 not just reading books, but personally debriefing survivors and going over autopsy reports \u2013 I\u2019ve come to consider the .380 marginal if not sub-marginal as a defensive weapon. I\u2019ve just seen too many cases of the bad guy sucking up bullet after .380 bullet in vital zones and still coming. But, I\u2019ve also seen cases like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tampabay.com\/news\/publicsafety\/crime\/two-people-shot-at-wesley-chapel-movie-theater\/2160784\" target=\"_blank\">the recent controversial Tampa shooting<\/a>, in which a senior citizen dropped the man he shot with a single .380 to the chest.\u00a0 (<em>I\u2019ve seen one-shot stops with well-placed .22 bullets, too, but I don\u2019t recommend a .22 for self-defense, either.<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>If you go on the gun forums, you\u2019ll find that a recurrent theme is \u201chow much is enough to use for self-defense, and how much is too much?\u201d\u00a0 And you\u2019ll discover that there\u2019s some ego investment in those discussions.<\/p>\n<p>The meme seems to be, \u201cIf you carry more (more powerful ammo, more cartridges, even more guns) than I do, you\u2019re paranoid.\u00a0 And if you carry less than I do, you\u2019re a pathetic sheeple.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Oh, good Lord\u2026<\/p>\n<p>First, if you\u2019re carrying a seven-shot .380, you are better prepared to defend yourself against a homicidal armed criminal than a high 90<sup>th<\/sup> percentile of the population, who are carrying nothing at all which could realistically stop such an attack.<\/p>\n<p>But, second, if that attack actually <i>comes, <\/i>you might wish you had something a little more than than a .380.\u00a0 The saying is: \u201cYou\u2019ll never meet a gunfight survivor who says he wishes he\u2019d had fewer, less powerful rounds.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Having shot the new Glock 42 with more .380 rounds than most folks outside the Glock factory, I was impressed with its ease of operation, <i>extremely <\/i>mild \u201ckick,\u201d and accurate delivery of rapid fire. There are a helluva lot of people \u2013 petite females, the elderly, the disabled \u2013 who will shoot faster and straighter with this gun than with something more powerful. There, I think, is its market niche\u2026wait a year or two, and see, but I expect it to become a best-seller.<\/p>\n<p>Will <i>I <\/i>carry one? Probably not. Whenever a gun magazine asks me to test a .380, I feel like Ralph Nader test-driving a Corvair for <i>Motor Trend. <\/i>But as someone who trains others to shoot, I am going to see about buying my test sample to keep it on hand so students who don\u2019t think or function as I do, can try it.<\/p>\n<p>As I write this, I\u2019m wearing a different Glock pistol. It\u2019s much more powerful than a .380, and holds far more cartridges than the slim little G42, and I have a spare \u201chigh capacity\u201d magazine on the opposite hip.\u00a0 That works for me, but I have to accept that some other people need something different to fit their abilities, their lifestyles, their dress codes.<\/p>\n<p>God save us from BS memes.\u00a0 A center hit with a .380 beats a miss or even a peripheral hit with a .44 Magnum.<\/p>\n<p><i>Something<\/i> is better than <i>nothing<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Discussion invited.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Firing one handed, I found recoil quite controllable with the new little Glock .380.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><a style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\" href=\"http:\/\/backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mas_G42.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2587\" alt=\"Massad Ayoob GLock42\" src=\"http:\/\/backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mas_G42.jpg\" width=\"450\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mas_G42.jpg 450w, https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mas_G42-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Note the best four of these 5 shots from benchrest at 25 yards. The one outlier may have been unnoticed human error. Sights have since been drifted for center hits. This is unusually good accuracy for pistols in this class. \u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Glock42.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2588\" alt=\"Glock 42 Remington Golden Saber\" src=\"http:\/\/backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Glock42.jpg\" width=\"450\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Glock42.jpg 450w, https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Glock42-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/a><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Looking through the relatively thin pickings of meaningful new gun designs in this year\u2019s crop, I noticed that one I mentioned here, the Glock 42, a seven-shot .380 pistol, got a ton of comment on the internet. Much of that commentary was on the theme of \u201cif I\u2019m going to carry a gun that size, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":6428,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2585","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-firearms"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2585\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/MassadAyoob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}