Those who are using the national grief over the recent school shooting to promote their gun-banning and rights-eroding agenda must be very unhappy at some of this week’s revelations.
When they ignore the laws of time and space and tell us that we’re safe without guns because police will magically appear to protect us when needed, they are still trying to ignore the fact that one or more deputies on the scene stood by during the murderous gunfire and did not make entry. They imply that it’s anomalous cowardice on the part of a single deputy, whose own anti-gun sheriff said he should have gone in alone and “killed the killer.” That sheriff claims that his own “amazing leadership” is not at fault.
However, the Miami Herald has learned that the deputies were ordered to hold an outside perimeter by their captain.
The prohibitionists say that if we should all be limited to ten-round magazines to reduce the carnage.
However, the Miami Herald has now announced that the murderer was using ten-round magazines. See this: and read to the end, please.
The prohibitionists say that a background check is the answer. Yet the killer in this case passed a background check, because “The System” failed at multiple points.
The prohibitionists imply that we should all back their concepts of “gun control” so the teenage kids who populated the well-orchestrated “town hall” on CNN a week after the murders can feel better and safer. If that seemed like an awfully spontaneous thing for traumatized mid-teens to accomplish on their own, your suspicions are confirmed: see
Every one of the above promises by the gun prohibition crowd has already been proven false and irrelevant to the case they are using as their lead argument.