Top Navigation  
 
U.S. Flag waving
Office Hours Momday - Friday  8 am - 5 pm Pacific 1-800-835-2418
 
Facebook   YouTube   Twitter
 
 
Backwoods Home Magazine, self-reliance, homesteading, off-grid

Features
 Home Page
 Current Issue
 Article Index
 Author Index
 Previous Issues
 Print Display Ads
 Print Classifieds
 Newsletter
 Letters
 Humor
 Free Stuff
 Recipes
 Home Energy

General Store
 Ordering Info
 Subscriptions
 Kindle Subscriptions
 ePublications
 Anthologies
 Books
 Back Issues
 Help Yourself
 All Specials
 Classified Ad

Advertise
 Web Site Ads
 Magazine Ads

BHM Blogs
 Ask Jackie Clay
 Massad Ayoob
 Claire Wolfe
 Where We Live
 Dave on Twitter
Retired Blogs
 Behind The Scenes
 Oliver Del Signore
 David Lee
 Energy Questions
 Bramblestitches

Quick Links
 Home Energy Info
 Jackie Clay
 Ask Jackie Online
 Dave Duffy
 Massad Ayoob
 John Silveira
 Claire Wolfe

Forum / Chat
 Forum/Chat Info
 Enter Forum
 Lost Password

More Features
 Meet The Staff
 Contact Us/
 Change of Address
 Write For BHM
 Disclaimer and
 Privacy Policy


Retired Features
 Country Moments
 Links
 Feedback
 Radio Show


Link to BHM

Living Freedom by Claire Wolfe. Musings about personal freedom and finding it within ourselves.

Want to Comment on a blog post? Look for and click on the blue No Comments or # Comments at the end of each post.



Archive for November 15th, 2012

Claire Wolfe

Thank you :-)

Thursday, November 15th, 2012

I was pretty excited to look at my Amazon wish list tonight.

Oh my. Some of the most needed items from the list are already coming my way, thanks to you. And some of the not-strictly-needed but most very cool are also in the “purchased” list. Someone — and I hope that person included a note with their identity — even bought something I never imagined anyone would.

Nobody is contributing to the generator fund. But that’s okay. ‘Cause you know, this is more fun. :-) I wish I could leave you all milk and cookies on Christmas Eve because you’re a bunch of darned fine Santas.

Claire Wolfe

The scandal

Thursday, November 15th, 2012

Unlike Joel, I’ve been thoroughly enjoying the Petraeus scandal.

Oh, not the sex part. What’s emerged about that so far is pretty dull: middle-aged married man boffs attractive, slightly younger married woman. This is news? (The British, who do sex scandals with more color and athleticism than anybody, must be laughing at us for getting excited over this.)

But what a marvelous cast of characters — from the “victim” who’s a more sketchy character than her anonymous stalker to the infamously shirtless FBI agent.

When somebody makes a movie out of this — and they must — it should be one hell of a black comedy.

I also admit to an ignoble degree of Schadenfreude. Petraeus was always too good to be true. Nobody should ever be that lionized — especially not somebody who’s in the killing business.

Are the journalists bloodhounding this trivial-looking story so thoroughly because they’re embarrassed at having fallen for the illusion of perfection? Or just because it’s good dirt? Or are they really digging for for something important beneath? (Why was this kept under wraps until juuuuuust after the election? What’s with America’s top brass hanging out with dubious “social liaisons”? Were those two human wisteria vines, the Kelley-Khawam sisters, running a high-class hooker ring and setting up government VIPs for blackmail? Nah, I doubt that — or they wouldn’t be so broke. But what kind of hold did they have over these generals, what kind of influence in power circles? The webs of influence here are weird.)

Oh, there is so much oozing out from the edges of the U.S. power structure and so little that’s actually known.

To me, the most intriguing detail is one that’s been mentioned only in passing — Petraeus showing up at a party at the Kelleys’ in a 28-vehicle motorcade.

If that’s true, think on what it says about the pretensions of this class of military mucky-mucks. Not only can you bet your booties that Mr. Four-Star didn’t pay for that accompaniment himself. But worse, what kind of “servants of the republic” (yeah, pardon the laughable term) parade to the parties of wealthy-but-dubious characters in grand cavalcades befitting a Medici or a Borgia? This isn’t Patton booming around in a Jeep. This is more like Benedict Arnold, whose craving for wealth, public displays of ostentation, and passion for a very much younger woman were keys to his downfall.

Not saying Petraeus is a traitor — except in the sense that most servants of Mordor-on-the-Potomac are traitors to the principles of liberty.

But well … you tell me. What more do you think might ooze out (or manage to stay hidden beneath) as this scandal grows? Is this just an overblown affair, something only prudes and yellow journalists could get all het up about? Or is it the “underblown” but titillating manifestation of something more corrupt and disgusting than we’re likely to learn?

 
 


 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Copyright © 1998 - Present by Backwoods Home Magazine. All Rights Reserved.