Backwoods Home Magazine

Subscribe to Backwoods Home Magazine
Or call us at
1-800-835-2418

Change of Address

Meet Dave Duffy, Annie Tuttle, and Sam Duffy at the Mother Earth News Fair, Puyallup, Washington. Click for Details..

Find Backwoods Home Magazine on Facebook

Features
 Home Page
 Current Issue
 Article Index
 Author Index
 Previous Issues
 Newsletter
 Letters
 Humor
 Free Stuff
 Feedback
 Recipes
 Tell-A-Friend
 Print Classifieds
 Radio Show

General Store
 Ordering Info
 Subscriptions
 Anthologies
 T-Shirts
 Books
 Back Issues
 Help Yourself
 All Specials
 Classified Ad

Advertise
 Web Site Ads
 Magazine Ads

BHM Blogs
 Behind The Scenes
 Massad Ayoob
 Ask Jackie Clay
 Claire Wolfe
 Where We Live
 Oliver Del Signore
 Bramblestitches
Retired Blogs
 David Lee
 Energy Questions

Quick Links
 Home Energy Info
 Jackie Clay
 Ask Jackie Online
 Dave Duffy
 Massad Ayoob
 John Silveira
 Claire Wolfe

Forum / Chat
 Forum/Chat Info
 Enter Forum
 Lost Password

More Features
 Links
 Country Moments
 Meet The Staff
 Contact Us/
 Change of Address
 Write For BHM
 Privacy Policy

News/Politics
 Dave Duffy
 John Silveira
 Columnists




Living Freedom by Claire Wolfe. Musings about personal freedom and finding it within ourselves.

Want to Comment on a blog post? Look for and click on the blue No Comments or # Comments at the end of each post.

Stacy Litz on Stacy Litz

May 12th, 2012 by Claire

Yesterday I wrote about activist-turned-drug-war-informant Stacy Litz.

Stacy commented on that post to say she knew her acts were heinous (her word), but that I was being unfair to her by making accusations, slanting my account, and using stale information.

At the time I blogged, I hadn’t been able to find any statements from Stacy herself. I knew they existed, but I kept getting dead links.

This morning I found two examples of Stacy talking about her experiences as an informant (and afterward). So here’s Stacy on Stacy, without any filtering from me:

“I Am a Victim of the American Drug War.” (A blog, originally intended to be anonymous.)

Interview with Stacy about her time as an informant. (Audio. Requires login. I couldn’t listen, so I don’t know what it says. Reddit comments are interesting, and not necessarily SFW.)

Book review: 31 Days to Survival

May 12th, 2012 by Claire

31 Days to Survival:
A Complete Plan for Emergency Preparedness

By M.D. Creekmore
Paladin Press 2012
153 pages

It’s felt like a long wait for M.D. Creekmore’s new book, 31 Days to Survival: A Complete Plan for Emergency Preparedness.

True, it’s been only a little over a year since his last book (Dirt-Cheap Survival Retreat: One Man’s Solution — my review here). But it’s been one vital year for preparedness.

Even some fairly dim bulbs are beginning to realize the problem now. If the Maya don’t get us first (and I expect we’re pretty safe from them), the Fed and its funny-money surely will. Or something else entirely.

In short, this is the time for preparedness manuals to find their way onto even the most mundane bookshelves.

So it’s good that 31 Days is here.

One thing I’ve always liked about M.D. Creekmore’s approach: He’s realistic. He never sends us off in search of $10,000 “perfect” survival weapons or iron-clad, million-dollar bunkers in North Idaho. His website, TheSurvivalistBlog.Net is focused on commonsense, real-world advice on living well and cheaply — in ways that enhance potential emergency/hard times survival.

Nor is his advice unbalanced. To read some survival authors, you’d think as long as you have really cool weapons, you don’t have to worry about food or water. Creekmore has always covered the full territory of preparedness.

31 Days continues that tradition. Its slender 153 pages contain 31 separate “to dos,” all laid out with calendar and checklist graphics (nice layout, there, Paladin Press).

The “assignments” range from the abstract (“Prevent and manage stress”) to the concrete (“Put together a survival kit for your automobile”). They cover some traditional “guy” topics (“Build a dead-fall trap”) and some that are more domestic (shopping for a 72-hour kit and sprouting seeds).

Of course, nobody’s really going to do all this in 31 days. (Most of us will spend more than 31 years attempting to conquer stress.) So the calendar thing is just a trope — a gimmick, if you will. But a useful one.

Breaking 31 tasks, some large and some small, into discrete assignments simplifies and demystifies them. Anybody who has tried to organize preparedness plans should appreciate that.

Creekmore’s advice is sensible, too. It’s simple, clearly written, and illustrated with photos or drawings where needed (e.g. making a small-game snare).

This is a nice little how-to guide. And perhaps it’s even a nicer “how to think about things” guide. Which is why his Day 19 — “Avoid these 10 prepping mistakes” — is a particular winner with me.

Don’t give up too early … Don’t invest in too many guns … Don’t buy a ton of books then ignore their advice (gulp — guilty on that one). Above all don’t try to follow somebody else’s preparedness plans. Instead, look at your own circumstances and needs and think out your own plan.

M.D. Creekmore’s approach is very good for getting us to sit down and, in an organized, non-overwhelming manner, do just that.

—–

Disclaimer: Through May 15, M.D. Creekmore is holding a contest for bloggers who want to review either his new book or his website. This review is eligible for the competition, but I hope I didn’t let that influence anything I wrote. If you have a blog, you, too, can enter for a chance to win a ton of survival-oriented books.

Lift up your fallen comrade or
kick her in the kidneys?

May 11th, 2012 by Claire

“When the comrade beside you falls …”

When the comrade beside you is captured by the enemy, do you curse her name and write her out of the movement, or do you rescue her if possible and aid her and keep solidarity with her if that’s the best you can do?

If the enemy extracts information from the fallen or captured comrade, at what point do you determine that that comrade is a traitor rather than a victim? …

In my view, we need to accept that the state is at war with us — all of us, not just “movement people” — and recognize that when we write off an actual or potential comrade because he or she was brutalized to the point of (quite possibly temporary) surrender, we are by definition adding one person to the state’s ranks and removing one person from our own.

When I read that Tom Knapp piece in the abstract, it makes some very moving sense. I respect Tom Knapp. This isn’t meant to dis him; just to disagree.

When I realize he’s writing about this young activist and stunning hypocrite who who turned three people into accused felons to save her own backside, I say, “Go ahead. Kick her in the kidneys.”

I don’t know erstwhile libertarian-anarchist Stacy Litz.

She apparently sold drugs to a cop. Seven times. Then became the cops’ agent. (That link is to another sympathetic account; many of the commenters on that article put it better.)

After getting busted, Litz rolled over about as fast as an eye can blink.

Two of the people she betrayed were fellow freedom activists.

All three of her victims are reportedly being more steadfast and principled in facing their plight than she was.

It appears that her real belief, beyond the freedomista rhetoric, is It’s perfectly okay for non-violent people to go to jail — as long as one of them isn’t me.

There’s no sign that she’s trying to undo any of the harm she caused. No sign of extenuating circumstances; she wasn’t waterboarded or threatened with death. She just betrayed her friends because it she thought it was better for them to suffer than for her to suffer.

This is really the only part of Tom Knapp’s essay I can agree with:

In my view, we need to accept that the state is at war with us …

That’s the indisputable truth.

None of us is perfect and as Tom Knapp implies, we can’t know another person’s breaking point — or even our own.

But how do you ever rescue and keep solidarity with someone who betrays both her principles and her friends to benefit tyrants? (And then reportedly whines that everybody’s being unfair to her) Why would you even try?

It’s not a matter of “adding one person to the state’s ranks and removing one person from our own.” She added herself to the state’s ranks — under pressure, granted. But she did it knowing she was doing unto others precisely what she didn’t want done to herself.

If you want her back in “our” ranks, you’re welcome to stand shoulder to shoulder with her. But don’t be surprised when she stabs you in the back.

If somebody has facts that change this picture, by all means speak up. I almost hope I have to admit I’m wrong and am being unfair.

Otherwise, place her name beside that of pseudo-anarchist Bob Black and leave it there.

—–

UPDATE Stacy left a comment on this post. I responded that I would gladly blog a full statement from her without editing or editorial comment, or link to any statement she’s posted elsewhere. I’ll be very glad if she responds with further information — even gladder if her statement details how she’s planning to help her victims.

Friday links

May 11th, 2012 by Claire

Finally (via Radley Balko), we have an explanation for why so many cops can’t get within a block of a dog without slaughtering it:

Dogs playing, eating, swimming, pooping, etc. -- all labeled "Threatening"

Convict scores impressive v*te
total against Obama

May 9th, 2012 by Claire

I think it’s a very good idea — if you’re going to elect someone at all — to throw your support behind a politician who’s already in prison.

You know, save time convicting him later and all that.

Besides, the guy has some pretty worthy positions.

Rocket stove mass heaters

May 9th, 2012 by Claire

Though I expect to be in town for quite a while, I gave in to temptation this morning and called about some small country acreages with owner financing. The spot is beautiful, the price pretty high (especially considering development costs), but the seller turned out to be a cool guy very much worth talking with.

He’s into permaculture is a longtime builder of woodstoves.

He was all excited about this: the rocket stove mass heater. (Here’s a Wikipedia article, which contains some reality checks.)

It’s a recent derivation from the rocket cook stove — though the fundamental technology has probably been around for thousands of years.

Heat your house with a $20 homemade stove from scrounged parts and wood that, in other places, would qualify only as kindling? Very interesting …

Anybody have any personal experience?

Tuesday links

May 8th, 2012 by Claire

What happens after
you refuse a police search

May 7th, 2012 by Claire

Flex Your Rights answers the question that’s been on so many minds …

Have questions regarding this Blog? Please email us. Comments may appear online in "Feedback" or in the "Letters" section of Backwoods Home Magazine. We read every email you send us, but due to the sheer volume of mail we receive, we can't respond to each one.











If you do business with one of our advertisers, please tell them you saw their ad on the Backwoods Home Magazine website.
Click Here for the Display advertisers who brought you the current issue of Backwoods Home Magazine
(PDF 3.33 MB)
Click Here for the Classified advertisers who brought you the current issue of Backwoods Home Magazine
(PDF 213 KB)

 
 
www.backwoodshome.com designed and maintained by Oliver Del Signore
© Copyright 1998 - Present by Backwoods Home Magazine